Agentic architecture audit
Tell us four things about what you have running and we send back a diagnosis of where it breaks first, why there and not somewhere else, and what changing it would cost. No charge, and no commitment to buy anything.
What gets looked at
Latency and execution time
Where a call blocks and how long it can run before something cuts it. This is the failure that shows up the day you swap in a model that reasons before answering.
Schema drift
What happens when the model returns a field under another name, or a number as text. Usually: nothing visible, and a wrong answer three steps later.
Memory and state
Whether the whole transcript travels on every turn, and what happens to a long conversation. It decides your cost per conversation and your concurrency ceiling.
Cost
How much of your spend is useful work, and how much is repeated context, blind retries and operations that multiply with every item processed.
The four answers
Rough is fine. What builds below is the message you will send: you can read all of it before it goes.
This is what gets sent
Answer above and the message will appear here, so you can read it before sending.
What you get back
- Where what you have breaks first, and why there rather than somewhere else.
- Which part of that is fixable without changing tools. There usually is one, and we say so even when it doesn't suit us.
- What the rest would cost, in work and in time, with the order we would do it in.
- And if what you have is fine as it is, that too. It is a short answer and you get it anyway.
Questions
Is this actually free?
Yes. What we get out of it is understanding what breaks out there, and sometimes a conversation that turns into a project. If it turns into nothing, the diagnosis is still yours.
Do we have to give you access to our systems?
No. The four answers above say a lot on their own; if something specific needs looking at, we ask in the conversation and you decide then.
Why isn't there a form that just submits?
Because today we have nowhere to receive it, and we would rather have a button that does something real — open your mail client with the message written — than one that looks like it sent and nobody knows where it went.
What if we already know we want to migrate?
Then the half-hour technical review is more use: you bring one concrete flow and we look at the code.